Seawell Elementary

School Governance Committee

Agenda

December 2nd, 2003

6:00-8:00 PM

Media Center

 

 
6:00 Welcome
6:15 Approval of Agenda
6:20 Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting
6:25 Principal's Report
6:30 Public Comment
6:35

Old Business

  • Discussion of 5th Grade End of Year Educational Field Trip Possibilities

  • Implementation of School Improvement Plan

  • Budget

  • Traffic Issues

  • Should we request a cap on school enrollment - our capacity is 496 and we are at 514

    • There are several apartment complexes being built in the area and Seawell is about to be flooded

7:40 New Business
  • Summary of SGC Chairs & Superintendent meeting (see below)
  • Review District Calendar proposals
  • Discussion of 4 commissioner proposals
    • Draft Proposal (see below)
    • See www.4schools.us for the 4 commissioner proposals
  • Should we ask Steve Scroggs to come to the January SGC meeting and talk about budget?
  • Maybe Seawell needs a facilities advocate volunteer
8:00 Set Agenda for Next Meeting
8:10 Adjourn

Susan Pegg was quoted in Schools Deal with the 'December Dilemma'

Notes from SGC chair meeting last week.  These are my best attempt at notes and I am not a court reporter, so please don't quote anyone from my notes.

 




Position Proposal for Consideration by the Seawell SGC regarding BOCC Proposals

Submitted By Mark Peters

The Seawell Elementary SGC commends the commissioners for hearing the concerns of their constituents and for creating proposals which address  these concerns.  The SGC has the following input regarding the November 11th, 2003 BOCC Proposals.

We support the idea of a task force to find the most effective ways for the two systems to cooperate.  However, we are concerned that the goals and boundaries of the task force have not yet been defined sufficiently for us to agree or disagree to this approach. 

We support the efforts to begin closing the funding inequity gap, particularly as Mrs. Gordon has proposed.

We believe that school district central offices should be centrally located the the respective constituencies and not housed in a central facility.  Therefore, we oppose Mr. Jacobs proposal for a single central office.  Likewise, pre-K facilities should be located in facilities throughout the county and not in a single location.

  We oppose Mr. Carey’s recommendation that a vote on merger occur in February 2004. 

 We would like to request that all commissioner candidates put their position on merger on the public record or in a notarized letter prior to the May primary election.